Skip to main content

Vapor Waitlist

This isn't a post I really wanted to write or share. The reason: it involves a brand I admire and respect. Some readers might decide that what I write here casts a negative light on that brand. At the end of the day, when I see information that just doesn't make sense, I feel obliged to comment on it regardless of whether it might ruffle a few feathers. I just feel a responsibility in that regard when it comes to readers and subscribers. It is important to me that the state of the watch market is truthfully known. As a side note: I'm going to soon post another story about the brand in question that highlights a neat achievement on their part, so please stay tuned.

Ok, so here we go. Last week, a story in Bloomberg claimed that watch brand Zenith now has wait lists that are similar to those seen at Rolex and Patek Philippe. To set the stage: buyers have recently waited months or years for certain models from Rolex, Patek, and Audemars Piguet (among others).

The Bloomberg story named a specific watch design that supposedly has a wait list: the Chronomaster Sport. Personally, I love this watch and I do believe it sold well for Zenith. But I simply do not believe that it has a wait list and I'd like to explain why.

A waitlist means there is a shortage. Waitlists and shortages necessarily mean that on the pre-owned market a watch will carry a price above the official retail price. The reason? People on the waitlist get tired of waiting and they pay current owners of the watch above retail in order to induce them to sell. We've seen this over and over with Submariners, Royal Oaks and Nautili. It's basically equivalent to paying a scalper more than the ticket price so that you can attend a concert by a hot artist.

A screenshot of preowned listings for the Chronomaster Sport. It was priced below retail on the day of the Bloomberg story.
I checked Chrono24 soon after the Bloomberg story dropped and you could buy a Chronomaster Sport for around $8,000, which is well below the retail price. This is strike one for the Bloomberg story. Let's turn to the next strike.

A day or two after the Bloomberg story, Topper Jewelers sent me an email stating that Zenith models were back in stock (I subscribe to their email distribution list, the timing of the Bloomberg story and the email I received is also curious). Topper is a Zenith authorized dealer on the west coast of the United States. I visited their web page and it turns out you could add a Chronomaster Sport to your shopping cart and click checkout (a screen recording of me doing just that is below). That is not consistent with a months-long or yearlong waitlist. Sure, Topper might have had a few people on their list, but it just couldn't have been very long (or exist at all) if inventory was available online. About 48 hours later and you can still buy these watches on Topper's web page (in fact, you can also buy the second design mentioned in the Bloomberg story but I digress). So, that is two strikes.

Really, this is enough to show that the Bloomberg story is, at minimum, exaggerated and even potentially false. The third strike for me was the DMs I exchanged with a number of extremely knowledgeable people in the watch industry. We're talking a GPHG jury member and the like. To a one, they stated the Bloomberg story was false (I will grant there was someone I highly respect who stated there were "no reasons to doubt" the claim but I hadn't shared my reasons yet).

This is where the greatest risk lies for any watch brand. If information about your brand is sussed out as false by knowledgeable collectors, you stand to lose them as buyers. Sure, you might reel in uniformed buyers who think they can buy a Chronomaster Sport at the retail price and flip it for a tidy $3,000 return (or whatever). Those buyers will feel burned, though, when they find out that their watch actually lost value the moment they walked out of the boutique. A brand really risks losing buyers of all stripes when these kinds of highly inaccurate stories circulate.

I don't know exactly how this inaccurate / false information about waitlists was born. The reality is that brands relying on distribution through authorized dealers do not always know the true state of play at the consumer touchpoint because they do not directly interact with buyers very often. However, it is clear that some skepticism regarding wait list claims is in order.

NB I wrote Bloomberg and stated my concerns with their article but they did not reply. At least one additional story about supposed waitlists for Zenith references are now circulating, but the models in question are still readily available at multiple online retailers.
My book on the history of Rolex marketing is now available on Amazon! It debuted as the #1 New Release in its category. You can find it here.

You can subscribe to Horolonomics updates here.

Comments

  1. Buy High Quality Replica Watches At AnyReplica.com . We Have Cheapest Rolex, Cartier, Breitling, IWC, Omega, Hublot Copy Watches.
    Replica watches

    ReplyDelete
  2. Best China replica watches wholesale,high quality Chinese replica watches online with free shipping and cheap price.
    aaa replica watches

    ReplyDelete
  3. Buy luxury Breitling replica watches online at the best prices. We have a wide range of copy Breitling watches for men and women. Most popular replica Breitling watches with cheap price.

    breitling replica shop

    ReplyDelete
  4. Buy Cartier replica watches online at cheap prices across the globe. Here you will find a wide range of Cartier copy watches at the best prices with excellent quality.

    cartier replica watches/a>

    ReplyDelete
  5. Buy top quality AAA Hublot replica watches in bestwatches.sr, and our fake Hublot watches are quality assured. A personalized pursuit of replica watches.
    Hublot

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fining the Crown

News recently broke that watch brand Rolex was on the receiving end of a €91 million fine levied by French authorities. A view of Rolex's offices in France. Source: Google Maps. Generally, the headlines ascribed this fine to Rolex's alleged practice of prohibiting online sales of its watches. However, I've looked closely at the situation and I don't think those headlines are completely accurate (although they're probably what French authorities would want you to believe). I came to this conclusion after reading a Google translation of a 134 page report issued by the French Competition Authority on December 19, 2023. Generally speaking, such documents do not make for engaging reading. However, for those who know how successful Rolex has been at maintaining a comparatively high level of corporate secrecy, the French report provides a compelling and rare insight into some specific aspects of the brand's business. It is these insights which lead me to conclu

Rolex in Court Part Deux: There's Audio

There comes a moment in the servicing of a watch that is probably easy to miss among the hundreds of steps required to remove a movement from a case, inspect the parts, repair anything amiss, lubricate all the pieces, and put the whole thing together again. A watch that Rolex's investigator bought at Beckertime for approximately $4,500. The lawsuit refers to this as "Counterfeit Watch One." That moment is when a watchmaker takes the dial and reattaches it to the movement. There is nothing particularly unique when it comes to the tools required or the tasks involved in this step. Instead, what is unique about this moment is that the watchmaker holds in their hand a mark that is not the property of the watchmaker and it is not exactly the property of the watch's owner. In the case of Vacheron Constantin, that mark is a Maltese Cross. For Audemars Piguet, it is the brand's initials. When it comes to Rolex, the mark is a widely recognized crown. If the reassembly

In-House Means In Control

Among many avid watch collectors, the term "in house movement" seems to elicit eyerolling disdain. Pieces of an assortment, including balance spring, from a non-Swiss movement. There is a sizeable perception that "in house" is, in fact, nothing more than an unnecessary marketing ploy designed to tease more money out of the wallet of buyers (by way of definition, an "in house" movement means that the mechanism inside a watch was predominently manufactured by a brand itself, kind of like "we make our own bread" at a restaurant). I'll confess that I'd begun to think similarly, that is, until I read a 66 page report posted by the Swiss Competition Commision on May 10, 2023. Yes, this is the kind of thing an economist finds interesting on a weekend, or at least this economist. Before we get into the details of this report, in the interest of full disclosure I should say that the original document was in a different language: lawyerese.